<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Know The Law: Buying Liquor Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.welovedc.com/2010/01/21/know-the-law-buying-liquor-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.welovedc.com/2010/01/21/know-the-law-buying-liquor-online/</link>
	<description>Your Life Beyond The Capitol</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fedward</title>
		<link>http://www.welovedc.com/2010/01/21/know-the-law-buying-liquor-online/comment-page-1/#comment-17295</link>
		<dc:creator>fedward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.welovedc.com/?p=26396#comment-17295</guid>
		<description>Also, it could be worse than Maryland has it. My parents live in Oklahoma, and my dad (a lawyer) has a friend (another lawyer) who is now an owner of a successful winery in California. Said winery now has a line of single-vineyard, single-varietal, single-vintage wines (e.g. the Bogus Wines 2006 Imaginary Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon), in addition to their usual varietal blends. A few years ago they bottled one such run and then ended up not labeling it (I think it might have been too small a run even for them), and it was handed off at cost to several Oklahoma lawyers …

… at which point they found out they couldn&#039;t import the stuff into Oklahoma at all. In the end they enlisted yet another lawyer who happened to own a wholesale distributor&#039;s license in the state, labels were printed, the distributor registered the vintage and paid the taxes, the winery shipped the wine to his warehouse, and they all got their wine about six months after they started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, it could be worse than Maryland has it. My parents live in Oklahoma, and my dad (a lawyer) has a friend (another lawyer) who is now an owner of a successful winery in California. Said winery now has a line of single-vineyard, single-varietal, single-vintage wines (e.g. the Bogus Wines 2006 Imaginary Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon), in addition to their usual varietal blends. A few years ago they bottled one such run and then ended up not labeling it (I think it might have been too small a run even for them), and it was handed off at cost to several Oklahoma lawyers …</p>
<p>… at which point they found out they couldn&#8217;t import the stuff into Oklahoma at all. In the end they enlisted yet another lawyer who happened to own a wholesale distributor&#8217;s license in the state, labels were printed, the distributor registered the vintage and paid the taxes, the winery shipped the wine to his warehouse, and they all got their wine about six months after they started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedward</title>
		<link>http://www.welovedc.com/2010/01/21/know-the-law-buying-liquor-online/comment-page-1/#comment-17291</link>
		<dc:creator>fedward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.welovedc.com/?p=26396#comment-17291</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://tumblr.fedward.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tumblr.fedward.org&lt;/a&gt; to you (and everybody else). :-P

DC&#039;s applicable code can be downloaded &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abra.dc.gov/abra/cwp/view,a,1272,q,642855.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;from the ABRA web site&lt;/a&gt;.  I think direct shipment was, in fact, legal before the &quot;Omnibus Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Act of 2008&quot; (its full name) was passed, but the quoted revision makes the permission explicit. The original § 25-772(b) read, &quot;No public or common carrier shall transport or bring into the District wine, spirits, or beer in a quantity in excess of one case per location in any one calendar month for delivery to any one person in the District other than the licensee under a manufacturer&#039;s, wholesaler&#039;s, or retailer&#039;s license.&quot; There are some real goodies in the full Title 25, though, like this one:
&lt;blockquote&gt;§ 25-1009. Operation of locomotive, streetcar, &lt;i&gt;elevator&lt;/i&gt; [emphasis added], or horse-drawn vehicle by 
intoxicated person prohibited.  
(a)  No person shall be intoxicated while in charge of or operating a locomotive; acting as 
a conductor or brakeman of a car or train of cars; or operating a streetcar, or horse-drawn 
vehicle.  
(b)  A person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor 
and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $300, or by imprisonment for 
not longer than 3 months, or both.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Apparently if you live in a high-rise, you&#039;re supposed to take the stairs when you&#039;re drunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s <a href="http://tumblr.fedward.org" rel="nofollow">tumblr.fedward.org</a> to you (and everybody else). :-P</p>
<p>DC&#8217;s applicable code can be downloaded <a href="http://www.abra.dc.gov/abra/cwp/view,a,1272,q,642855.asp" rel="nofollow">from the ABRA web site</a>.  I think direct shipment was, in fact, legal before the &#8220;Omnibus Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Act of 2008&#8243; (its full name) was passed, but the quoted revision makes the permission explicit. The original § 25-772(b) read, &#8220;No public or common carrier shall transport or bring into the District wine, spirits, or beer in a quantity in excess of one case per location in any one calendar month for delivery to any one person in the District other than the licensee under a manufacturer&#8217;s, wholesaler&#8217;s, or retailer&#8217;s license.&#8221; There are some real goodies in the full Title 25, though, like this one:</p>
<blockquote><p>§ 25-1009. Operation of locomotive, streetcar, <i>elevator</i> [emphasis added], or horse-drawn vehicle by<br />
intoxicated person prohibited.<br />
(a)  No person shall be intoxicated while in charge of or operating a locomotive; acting as<br />
a conductor or brakeman of a car or train of cars; or operating a streetcar, or horse-drawn<br />
vehicle.<br />
(b)  A person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor<br />
and, upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $300, or by imprisonment for<br />
not longer than 3 months, or both.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently if you live in a high-rise, you&#8217;re supposed to take the stairs when you&#8217;re drunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.welovedc.com/2010/01/21/know-the-law-buying-liquor-online/comment-page-1/#comment-17288</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.welovedc.com/?p=26396#comment-17288</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this!  I had wine shipped to me in VA (4 bottles), but I never really knew what was allowed.  I just assumed it was ok since the company I ordered from listed VA as a state they could ship to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this!  I had wine shipped to me in VA (4 bottles), but I never really knew what was allowed.  I just assumed it was ok since the company I ordered from listed VA as a state they could ship to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

