WSJ: The Nationals Are Like The Senate GOP

Photo courtesy of
courtesy of ‘twinkletoez’

And, I have no idea who is worse for the comparison. But, here, the WSJ argues that like the Nationals, the Senate GOP is asking, “Why are we here?”

It’s hard not to think of a few more obvious parallels to yesterday’s hysterical McSweeney’s piece on what might happen if the 1977 Royals were in charge of the hearings. Certainly, it’s funnier to think what it might be like if the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary Committee were members of the Nationals. Perhaps Senator Hatch (R-UT) could start in place of Adam Dunn? I mean, he can’t be any worse in the field, right? I suspect Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) could stare down batters a lot more effectively than Kip Wells. What are your picks?

I live and work in the District of Columbia. I write at We Love DC, a blog I helped start, I work at Technolutionary, a company I helped start, and I’m happy doing both. I enjoy watching baseball, cooking, and gardening. I grow a mean pepper, keep a clean scorebook, and wash the dishes when I’m done. Read Why I Love DC.

Facebook Twitter Flickr 

Comments are closed.